Ask me,
tell me,
I ask you:
What is the ... ?
Who was the ... ?
When did ... ?
How can ... ?
Which ... ?
How many ... ?
Where ... ?
Why ... ?
|
Modular Language Techniques
- ONTOLOGY categorization, causation, derivation
- MOTIVATION MODEL
- situation analysis
- discourse style / type
- motivations, priorities
- information states
- scalar (key word), vector (syntax) language
- CONCEPTUAL RESONANCE
- function of literature - reshape resonance fields
- appropriate, yet unexpected
- beautiful, stimulating, amusing
- DICTIONARY: subject/obj expected category
- action: actor class, object class
- methods for 7 interrogatives: Who, What, Where, When, Why, How, Which
Digital Thought language comprehension software is being designed to accomodate a variety of ways of expressing a particular idea.
For example, an oceanliner may be referred to as a cruise ship, a big boat, or metaphorically as a floating city. Digital Thought applies several techniques to evaluate the semantic equivalence.
Canonical Terms: First, Digital Thought anchors meaning to a set of canonical, or preferred formal terms such as "cruise ship", or "International Space Station". User input employing canonical terms is routed directly to the referenced information entity. (data/International_Space_Station)
Registered Synonyms: Secondly, if Digital Thought does not immediately recognize a term, a thesaurus is consulted to obtain the canonical equivalent to the term in question. (oceanliner = cruise ship)
|
Deconstruction: Third, Digital Thought will attempt to process unrecognized terms by separating leading or trailing modifiers from the entity description and then attempting independent term lookup. ($modifier $object_class) ($first_name $last_name)
Ontology: Fourth, if the non-canonical term is a class, Digital Thought will seek an appropriate data entity from the list of category instances. (boat > cruise ship)
Conceptual Resonance: Fifth, if metaphor or abstraction veils the subject identity, a conceptual network is invoked to discern it using shared feature comparison.
|
|